Pain Science Education for Pelvic Pain: What the Research Really Says
By Stephanie Prendergast, MPT, PHRC Pasadena
Pain science education (PSE)—sometimes called pain neuroscience education—aims to help people understand what pain is, how it’s produced by the nervous system, and why it can persist even after tissues have healed. In chronic pelvic pain, where biological, psychological, and social factors often intertwine, that reconceptualization can be powerful: it can lower fear, boost self-efficacy, and open the door to graded movement, pelvic floor relaxation, and other active strategies. But how strong is the evidence specifically for pelvic pain?
What PSE is (and isn’t)
PSE is not a pep talk and it’s not a substitute for medical work-up. It’s structured learning about pain biology that targets threat appraisal, catastrophic thinking, and protective behaviors (like over-guarding the pelvic floor). A recent international e-Delphi study distilled 92 clinician-endorsed learning points for pelvic pain into 13 core concepts—e.g., “pelvic pain involves changes in the nervous system,” “pain ≠ damage,” “many factors (sleep, stress, hormones, pelvic floor tone) can amplify pain,” and “pelvic pain can change and improve.” It also highlights pelvic-specific themes such as cross-organ sensitization and why flares don’t necessarily mean disease is worsening. These clinician-derived concepts provide a concrete curriculum to guide care and future trials. Frontiers
Do guidelines recommend education for pelvic pain?
Yes. A systematic review of 17 international clinical practice guidelines for benign gynecologic and urologic conditions associated with persistent pelvic pain found that two-thirds explicitly recommend patient education, though they vary on what to teach and how to deliver it (e.g., written materials, support groups). The authors also noted guideline quality was mixed and called for better, tailored education interventions. PubMed
For men with chronic pelvic pain/chronic prostatitis, the 2025 American Urological Association guideline similarly emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach that includes patient education and psychological therapies such as CBT, alongside pelvic floor therapy and other modalities. American Urological Association
What’s the direct evidence for PSE in pelvic pain?
Although the pelvic-specific PSE literature is still maturing, early data are encouraging:
- Knowledge changes after a single seminar. In a pre–post study of women with chronic pelvic pain, a 90-minute neuroscience-based seminar significantly improved scores on the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire and deepened conceptual understanding. Knowledge isn’t a clinical endpoint, but it’s a key mechanism target for PSE. Sydney Pelvic Clinic
- Randomized trial in genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD). A three-arm RCT tested four weekly educational workshops (covering pelvic anatomy, pain neuroscience, and sexuality) delivered face-to-face or online versus waitlist. Both active formats improved pain intensity, pain-related outcomes (e.g., catastrophizing), and sexual function—benefits that did not depend on socioeconomic status. While the package included anatomy and sexuality content alongside PSE, it’s a rare randomized signal that an education-centric program can improve clinically meaningful outcomes in pelvic pain. SpringerLink
- Biopsychosocial programs where PSE is a core component. A 2025 systematic review of 14 RCTs in women with chronic pelvic pain found CBT and ACT-based approaches, mindfulness, and physiotherapy-based programs reduced pain and improved emotional outcomes. Across intervention types, two elements kept showing up as important: pain science education and structured exposure/engagement with valued activity. This points to PSE as a common “active ingredient” in effective multimodal care. PMC
Taken together, these findings suggest PSE helps patients reconceptualize their pain and, when paired with active strategies, can contribute to reductions in pain and distress in pelvic pain populations. The evidence base is still smaller than in back or neck pain, but it’s growing.
What about the much larger (non-pelvic) PSE literature?
Zooming out helps calibrate expectations. An umbrella review across chronic musculoskeletal pain concluded that PSE added to active treatments (most often exercise) tends to yield greater improvements—especially for psychosocial targets like catastrophizing and kinesiophobia—than the same treatments without PSE. By contrast, PSE alone shows inconsistent effects on pain and disability. The message is clear: use PSE as a catalyst within a broader active plan, not as a standalone. Frontiers
What patients say they need from PSE
A 2024 qualitative study asked women with “improved” pelvic pain what PSE ideas mattered most. Four themes stood out: (1) a sensitized nervous system can become overprotective (validation), (2) pain doesn’t always mean damage (reassurance and reduced fear), (3) thoughts, feelings, and attention can amplify pain (self-management levers), and (4) pain can change, slowly (hope plus a realistic time course). These patient-voiced concepts align well with the clinician-derived curriculum above and reinforce the need for tailored, stigma-reducing language. PubMed
Practical takeaways for clinicians and patients
- Tailor the content. Start with core concepts (pain ≠ damage; sensitization; many contributors) and add pelvic-specific pieces: pelvic floor guarding and down-training, cross-organ sensitization (e.g., bladder–bowel–pelvic floor “crosstalk”), hormonal influences (adolescence, perimenopause), and how flares can be managed without panic. The new pelvic pain PSE curriculum is a helpful scaffold. Frontiers
- Pair PSE with active strategies. Use education to lower threat and increase confidence, then lock in gains with graded movement, pelvic floor relaxation training, sexual pain pacing strategies, sleep/stress skills, and goal-oriented exposure to valued activities. This mirrors what effective RCT programs actually do. PMC
- Mind the psychosocials. Catastrophizing, fear-avoidance, and low self-efficacy are common in pelvic pain and are responsive targets for PSE and CBT-style skills. Major guidelines recommend integrating behavioral therapies and patient education into care plans. PubMedAmerican Urological Association
- Delivery can be flexible. Group workshops (with partner inclusion), one-to-one sessions, printed/online materials, and telehealth can all work. The GPPPD RCT suggests online and face-to-face education can be similarly effective when content and structure are sound. SpringerLink
Where the evidence is still thin
We still need larger, high-quality pelvic-specific RCTs that isolate the contribution of PSE, report core outcomes, and test dose, timing, and delivery (individual vs group; in-person vs digital). Encouragingly, researchers have now defined what to teach; the next step is rigorous trials testing how best to teach it and for whom. Meanwhile, multimodal programs that include PSE remain the most evidence-aligned option. FrontiersPMC
References
American Urological Association. (2025). Male chronic pelvic pain guideline. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/guidelines/male-chronic-pelvic-pain-guideline American Urological Association
James, A., Thompson, J., Neumann, P., & Briffa, K. (2019). Change in pain knowledge after a neuroscience education seminar for women with chronic pelvic pain. Australian and New Zealand Continence Journal, 25(2), 39–44. (PDF). Sydney Pelvic Clinic
Johnson, S., Bradshaw, A., Bresnahan, R., Evans, E., Herron, K., & Hapangama, D. K. (2025). Biopsychosocial approaches for the management of female chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review. BJOG, 132(3), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17987 (Open Access). PMC
Mardon, A. K., Leake, H. B., Szeto, K., Moseley, G. L., & Chalmers, K. J. (2024). Recommendations for patient education in the management of persistent pelvic pain: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Pain, 165(6), 1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003137 PubMed
Mardon, A. K., Leake, H. B., Wilson, M. V., Karran, E. L., Parker, R., Malani, R., Moseley, G. L., & Chalmers, K. J. (2025). Pain science education concepts for pelvic pain: An e-Delphi of expert clinicians. Frontiers in Pain Research, 6, 1498996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2025.1498996 (Open Access). Frontiers
Mardon, A. K., Chalmers, K. J., Heathcote, L. C., et al. (2024). “I wish I knew then what I know now”—Pain science education concepts important for female persistent pelvic pain: A reflexive thematic analysis. Pain, 165(9), 1990–2001. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003205 PubMed
Cuenca-Martínez, F., et al. (2023). Pain neuroscience education in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: An umbrella review. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, 1272068. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1272068 (Open Access). Frontiers
Lopez-Brull, A., Pérez-Domínguez, B., Cantón-Vitoria, L., Plaza-Carrasco, M., & Nahon, I. (2023). Association levels between results from a therapeutic educational program on women suffering from genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder and their socioeconomic status. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 20, 1180–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00790-7 (Open Access; includes RCT methods and outcomes). SpringerLink
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Check out our recently published e-book titled “Vulvodynia, Vestibulodynia, and Vaginismus,” designed to empower and inform individuals on their journey towards healing and understanding.
Are you unable to come see us in person in the Bay Area, Southern California or New England? We offer virtual physical and occupational therapy appointments too!
Virtual sessions are available with PHRC pelvic floor physical and occupational therapistss via our video platform, Zoom, or via phone. For more information and to schedule, please visit our digital healthcare page.
Do you enjoy or blog and want more content from PHRC? Please head over to social media!